Categories: Uncategorized

Saudis put Palestinians on trial over vague claims

Saudis put Palestinians on trial over vague claims

While it donates food to Gaza, Saudi Arabia has put dozens of Palestinians on trial over vague allegations.

 Ashraf AmraAPA images

Maureen Clare Murphy17 April 2020
A mass trial of dozens of Palestinians and Jordanians of Palestinian origin in Saudi Arabia over vague allegations of links to terror groups is riddled with rights abuses, Human Rights Watch stated on Friday.
Authorities began the closed-door trial early last month after holding some of the 68 detainees, many of whom are long-term residents of the Arab Gulf monarchy, for nearly two years without charge, the rights group added.
Earlier this year, Amnesty International said that the arbitrary arrests were “part of a wider crackdown by the Saudi Arabian authorities on Palestinians residing in Saudi Arabia with a perceived link to Hamas.”

“Acute dangers”

Human Rights Watch’s deputy Middle East director Michael Page pointed to “Saudi Arabia’s long record of unfair trials,” and the “acute dangers to prisoners” posed by COVID-19.
One of the defendants, Mohammed al-Khudari, the 82-year-old former representative of Hamas to Saudi Arabia, has cancer.
He and his son, Hani al-Khudari, a 48-year-old IT professor at a Saudi university, were held incommunicado and in solitary confinement for the first three months of their detention, according to Amnesty.
“Family members of defendants described a range of abuses by Saudi authorities following the arrests, including enforced disappearances, long-term solitary confinement and torture,” Human Rights Watch stated.
A witness to a mass trial hearing on 8 March told the rights group that the judge was present in the courtroom for only 20 minutes.
The witness said that defendants were asked if they were guilty, and only then did the judge give them partial portions of their charge sheets “that did not include evidence or the basis of the charges.”
Family members said the charge sheets cited articles of Saudi law penalizing involvement with terrorist organizations.
A United Nations human rights expert has decried Saudi Arabia’s “unacceptably broad definition of terrorism” and other national security measures which have been used against “human rights defenders, writers, bloggers, journalists and other peaceful critics.”

Palestinians sacrificed for Israel alliance

In early 2018, Saudi crown prince Mohammad Bin Salman embarked on a high-profile US tour in which he promoted a supposedly transformational reform agenda for the country.
Part of that agenda was promoting the perception of a cozier Saudi relationship with Israel, which sees a common enemy in Iran.
Israel seeks non-aggression pacts with Arab Gulf states as years of clandestine ties have recently come into the open.
Efforts towards the normalization of relations between Israel and the Gulf states, led by Saudi Arabia, comes at the expense of Palestinian national liberation.
And it also comes at the expense of the basic liberties of the citizens of those Gulf states.
The malware produced by Israel’s notorious NSO Group has been implicated in the killing of Jamal Khashoggi, the Saudi journalist lured to his country’s Istanbul consulate where he was murdered and dismembered soon after Bin Salman’s US charm offensive.
Bin Salman is widely believed to be complicit in Khashoggi’s killing, likely having ordered it.
Amnesty International, whose staff were targeted with NSO Group malware, is suing the company to stop its role in abusive surveillance.
Israel’s cyber warfare industry has deep ties with the country’s military and intelligence apparatus, which uses Palestinians under military occupation as unwilling test subjects for systems that are then exported to other countries such as Saudi Arabia.
Categories: Uncategorized

Prez Gotabaya Virtually Tells The Tamils Et Al: “Go To Hell !”


Categories: Uncategorized

Sri Lanka: One Island Two Nations


Categories: Uncategorized

The faulty science, doomism, and flawed conclusions of Deep Adaptation

The faulty science, doomism, and flawed conclusions of Deep Adaptation

The claim that runaway climate change has made societal collapse inevitable is not only wrong – it undermines the cause of the climate movement.

Image: John Englart, CC BY-SA 2.0

Thomas NicholasGalen HallColleen Schmidt-14 July 2020

As members of Extinction Rebellion and other climate movements, we have been overjoyed at the success of our movement in ringing the alarm about climate and ecological breakdown, and in applying pressure to the UK government, as well as other governments worldwide. As members of the science community, we have also found comfort in a movement dedicated to telling a truth that has for decades been obscured by corporate public relations campaigns and misinformation.

Many scientists support Extinction Rebellion or are active members, lending some immediate authority to our message of climate and ecological emergency. The need for peaceful civil disobedience has been explicitly supported by over a thousand scientists. Arrested Extinction Rebellion activists received support during their trials from high-profile scientists acting as expert witnesses. As scientists ourselves, we support our movement’s goal of halting greenhouse gas emissions and biodiversity loss rapidly and equitably, but we also know that doing so successfully requires clarity about what science can and cannot tell us. Such clarity is especially important now. In the past few years we have seen a troubling trend: a few figures in the climate movement using science — or what looks like science — to justify increasingly dire and prophetic, but ultimately unsupported, claims about the future.

The most influential example of such climate doomism is undoubtedly Professor Jem Bendell’s ‘Deep Adaptation’, a self-published 2018 paper which holds that accelerating climate change has guaranteed social collapse within the next few decades. Hundreds of thousands of people have downloaded ‘Deep Adaptation’ and the paper has significantly impacted the ideology and strategy of climate movement organizations like Extinction Rebellion. People have changed their life plans based in large part on this paper’s predictions. It is therefore past time to show that Deep Adaptation is wrong — not least because Bendell’s brand of doomism relies heavily on misinterpreted climate science that undermines the credibility of his claims. In fact, Deep Adaptation consistently cherry-picks data, cites false experts, puts forward logical fallacies, and disregards robust scientific consensus. Bendell defends himself by offering unsupported reasons for activists and the public to distrust mainstream climate science. In all of these regards, Deep Adaptation mimics the practices that deniers of global warming have wielded for decades.

Why is it important to deconstruct Deep Adaptation now, in the midst of a global pandemic? In short, the fatal verdict handed down by Deep Adaptation brings with it a bundle of personal and strategic implications with the potential to cripple us as a movement. The flawed science of Deep Adaptation supports flawed socio-political conclusions. The pandemic makes the divergence between these flawed conclusions and the ones we ought to draw all the more apparent. Where Deep Adaptation implies that scientific understanding can no longer save us from catastrophe, COVID-19 has shown the critical importance of science-based policy. Where Deep Adaptation backs away from questions of equity and distribution in the face of disaster, COVID has shown that (in)justice only becomes more important under such circumstances. The people who have suffered most under the coronavirus will also suffer disproportionately from climate change. Conversely, the same people who oppose climate justice and malign climate science also bear central responsibility for disastrous COVID-19 responses in countries like the US, England and Brazil. The coronavirus pandemic may open a window for policy shifts to begin an equitable transition away from our carbon based economy — in which case we cannot allow a faulty quasi-ideology like Deep Adaptation to mislead us.

To be totally clear, we argue that all of the following are simultaneously true:

1. There is an unprecedented global climate and ecological emergency. If governments do not undertake enormous measures to mitigate climate change, then some form of “societal collapse” is plausible — albeit in varying forms and undoubtedly far worse for the poorest people.

2. Policymakers and society at large are not treating this grave threat with anything approaching sufficient urgency.

3. The climate crisis is dire enough in any case to justify urgent action, including mass sustained nonviolent disruption, to pressure governments to address it swiftly.

4. However, neither social science nor the best available climate science support Deep Adaptation’s core premise: that near-term societal collapse due to climate change is inevitable.

5. This false belief undermines the environmental movement and could lead to harmful political decisions, overwhelming grief, and fading resolve for decisive action.

6. Respecting the distinction between the coming hardships and unstoppable collapse clarifies our agency to minimise future harm by mitigating and adapting to climate change, whilst freeing us from moral and political blinkers.

Deep Adaptation: unfounded doomism

Deep Adaptation is just one prominent case of a stubborn class of doomist narratives. Doomism has always occupied an influential place within the western environmental movement. It was present during the first Earth Day, fifty years ago, in concern over the coming ‘population bomb’. When one instance of doomism becomes discredited or disproven, another appears, generally following a re-examination of the state of environmental degradation. The resulting dire findings are then used to justify a fatalist ideology or response.


Read More

Categories: Uncategorized



Sri Lanka Brief13/07/2020

“Considering growing concerns over shrinking space for dissent domestically, the Council remains effectively the only forum where Sri Lankan civil society has the possibility to engage openly in dialogue with the Government and other States on human rights concerns in Sri Lanka and the Human Rights Council needs to take a more robust approach on Sri Lanka” says the joint oral statement dilivered at the ongoing HRC44 by international human rights organisations.

Full statement:

Joint Oral Statement 44th session of the Human Rights Council,

Item 3: Interactive dialogue with the Special Rapporteur on the rights to freedom of peaceful assembly and of association /10 July 2020.

Thank you, Madam President.

As the Special Rapporteur’s report demonstrates, the space for Sri Lankan civil society is rapidly shrinking. For several months now, civil society organisations have been subject to intensified military surveillance and questioning by different government authorities.

Worryingly, the COVID-19 pandemic has been exploited by the Sri Lankan government to impose restrictions on the rights to freedom of expression, association and peaceful assembly, resulting in the arrest and detention of social media commentators like Ramzy Razeek. Senior lawyer and minority and civic rights activist, Hejaaz Hizbullah, who was arrested and detained on suspicion of offences under the draconian Prevention of Terrorism Act, has now been detained for close to three months without being produced before a judge, after having been misled to believe that the authorities were visiting his house to discuss his potential exposure to COVID-19.

Since January 2020, the Government of Sri Lanka has established multiple Presidential Task Forces.
Decisions have been taken with no oversight by Parliament. The Presidential Task Force to build a “Secure Country, Disciplined, Virtuous and Lawful Society” is fully comprised of security sector personnel and given an ambiguous mandate. Sri Lankan civil society has raised a serious concern that the task force can extend military control over civilian life.

Its power can be abused to curtail dissenting voices which are deemed to be “harmful to the free and peaceful existence of society”. The increased deployment of military personal along with the police, and the disproportionate use of force against peaceful protesters, as observed recently, are also alarming.

Considering growing concerns over shrinking space for dissent domestically, the Council remains effectively the only forum where Sri Lankan civil society has the possibility to engage openly in dialogue with the Government and other States on human rights concerns in Sri Lanka, and even this space is increasingly under threat due to deepening risks of reprisals against Sri Lankan civil society actors who speak at the Council. Those human right defenders are increasingly vilified as “traitors” in both mainstream and social media Given Sri Lanka’s announced withdrawal from its commitments to the implementation of resolution 30/1, and the clear and consistent recommendations by the OHCHR that the Council should monitor progress towards accountability, the Council needs to take a more robust approach on Sri Lanka. Against this backdrop, we encourage the Special Rapporteur to continue to follow up on the situation and urge the Human Rights Council to enhance its monitoring of Sri Lanka’s compliance with international human rights law, including to ensure that human rights are protected throughout the forthcoming general elections.
Thank you.

Categories: Uncategorized

The General Election of 2020

The General Election of 2020

We must vote to save, secure and advance the institutions of liberal democracy that we have – Pic by Shehan Gunasekara

Tuesday, 14 July 2020

In terms of the issues at stake, the 5 August General Election poses the same challenges as the Presidential Election of November 2019 and more. Not necessarily because of the intervening hiatus of the coronavirus either.

November 2019 was about electing someone who in the widest public perception would get a job done in sharp contrast to the Sirisena-Wickremesinghe regime that preceded it and also the front person for the Jathika Chinthanaya based ideology of a new constitution and form of governance. It was therefore a vote for clear and decisive leadership; for law and order and stability and for legitimacy rooted in the heart of society.

This was secured with a majority of over 1.5 million votes in an election, which it must be said, the opposition in effect handed over power to Rajapaksa through its own incompetence as he indeed, won it through his overwhelming charisma and appeal.

Rajapaksa therefore has the mandate to govern as he sees fit and without the encumbrance of Parliament, in the COVID era, he has effectively given reign to his militaristic impulses and established Task Forces for a disciplined, virtuous and law-abiding society as well as for archaeological heritage in the east. Moreover, the handling of the COVID virus is in the hands of those in the military and those who were in the military – a military mindset. Ironically one of the groups largely affected by the virus is the Navy! No one is asking the question as to how this has happened; the regime is certainly not telling.

This brings us therefore to the importance of Parliament and the General Election. In any functioning democracy or any society with the pretensions of being one, the three basic pillars of government must operate i.e. the executive, legislature and judiciary. One of these pillars should not have the power to lay down the law to the others in a variation of Vattel’s definition of the balance of power.

Moreover, the basic functions of the three pillars is that the executive would be responsible for the implementation of the laws that the legislature debates and passes – these could be laws that the executive proposes in the first instance. Parliament is essentially a deliberative body and debating chamber; it is not about implementation but it is about the allocation and accountability of resources for the implementation of policies it agrees upon. The judiciary upholds the rule of law and interprets the actions of the executive within the framework of the constitution.

Since the second of March dissolution of Parliament this system could not operate. Was not allowed to. The Supreme Court held with the executive on this and from the second of June until the next parliament meets, there is really no authority for the raising and expenditure of public finance. The hallowed and if not also hackneyed adage about parliamentary authority over public finance – No taxation without Representation – has been thrown overboard.

Whilst the management of the COVID virus spread is being seen as a relative success, there is the economic time bomb ticking away and the increasing authoritarian majoritarianism of a regime and chief executive who arrests lawyers but does not bring them to court and pardons ex-army officers for the most horrendous of crimes for which, conviction has been handed down by the highest court in the land.

Economically we have been downgraded by the rating agencies to B- and back to lower middle-income status. It is estimated that over the next five years we will have to pay back in debt repayments approximately $ 4 billion a year. Some estimates are higher. International lenders are presumably waiting for a new Parliament to start negotiations on relief. Some money is being given to small and medium business relief and money from China has been pledged.

The Japanese have suspended discussions on debt relief. The ridiculous and it appears, deliberately misleading controversy over the Millennium Challenge Account grant of $ 480 million is further damaging. What happens when the toll of unemployment in the garment sector, the hospitality trade, migrant labour, and small and medium businesses begins to bite and bite harder?

Consolidating the dynasty

The General Election for the regime has always been about securing a two-third majority in Parliament to consolidate the dynasty. For the President, specifically, it is about the people’s mandate constitutionally sanctioned by an election to create a system of government and governance to his liking. He clearly likes the unfettered room for manoeuvre afforded by the 1978 Constitution and it will be no surprise therefore if he moves fast, two thirds granted directly to him or not, to return to it without the restrictions of the Nineteenth Amendment and what he and his supporters see, as the costly irrelevance of the Thirteenth.

This could happen against a rising tide of discontent on the economic front and the use, yet again, of the constitution for instrumental purposes – defence of national security, stability and law and order – a defence against those both local and international who fall on the wrong side of the patriot/traitor divide. Yet the economic consequences of the virus may outlive the euphoria of populist and authoritarian constitutional reform. It all depends in how badly it is going to hit was has so far been the Rajapaksa constituency in the population. If it is going to be bad and going to evoke a ham-fisted and heavy handed response form the regime, we will be back to fighting for basic human rights, basic civil and political rights.

There is the issue of what the voter should do in this election – that is the voter who does not have a fixed partisan affiliation. It appears too that there is the disaffection with the choice of parties and candidates available and therefore a decision not to vote. In the event, if voting is decided upon, to spoil the ballot. Whilst this might appease individual consciences, this will also enable the mandate to be based on a smaller proportion of the total national vote and in order to secure fundamental rights and duties, institutions and processes of a functioning liberal democracy no one side should be so powerful as to be in a position to lay down the law to others. Checks and balances are the order of the day – both institutional and procedural. We must vote to save, secure and advance the institutions of liberal democracy that we have.

Either way, inside Parliament and out, no liberal democracy is worth its salt without a strong opposition. What we are presented with is dismal – on the street they say that one faction of the UNP is with the President and the other with the Prime Minister. There is therefore no real choice – no real champion of a Sri Lanka founded upon the idea of Unity in Diversity and committed to protect and expand it at all costs. This leaves the section of civil society who had its heyday in October 2018 to return to the fight of explaining the importance of the constitution and democracy to the everyday life of the peoples and their country.

Were the Democrats to win the US presidency in November, there is the chance of a more human rights and democracy friendly international environment taking hold.

However, the point is simply that the design and trajectory of political, economic and constitutional developments for Sri Lanka should be the primary responsibility of Sri Lankans – we are the stakeholders and the country is the site of contestation and struggle.

Categories: Uncategorized

Elections without postponement necessary to meet challenges

Elections without postponement necessary to meet challenges


By Jehan Perera-

The containment of Covid spread in Sri Lanka relative to other countries, including its immediate neigbours, put the government on a strong footing to face the general elections on August 5. The recent disclosures that the virus may have spread more widely than previously believed is not likely to change this perception in the short term. The general public perception if that this government is one that is capable of handling challenges as it is the same government leadership that scored victory over the LTTE. The confidence of government leaders in the support of the electorate is so great that they have been campaigning for a victory that would give them a 2/3 majority in parliament. This is a feat that has eluded all previous governments since the proportional system was introduced in 1978.

Since the curfew and lockdowns ended in mid-May there has been a major relaxation of tension within the country regarding the Covid virus. Even government leaders began to take the matter lightly, as evidenced in the funeral arrangements for a former minister which saw tens of thousands of his party supporters jostling at the funeral which was attended by the most senior government leaders. In particular the president’s firm leadership and use of the security forces to lead the battle against Covid has given the general population the confidence that difficult decisions can and will be made as and when necessary. As a result the warnings by health authorities that continued precautions were necessary was widely ignored in the return to normalcy.

In this context, the identification of a new cluster of Covid infection centering around a rehabilitation centre in Polonnaruwa might have been taken in its stride. When the discovery was first announced there was not much public agitation. The discovery of a similar Covid cluster amongst navy personnel who were part of the security forces effort in leading the anti-Covid campaign was dealt with effectively without causing panic. The decision of the ruling party to halt its bigger election campaign activities for three days can be viewed positively as a message of care given by government leaders that there is a serious health crisis and they are giving priority to the people’s health over their electoral activities. The government’s decision to close all schools this week is a similar message of care in view of reports that young schoolchildren are amongst those infected.


At a time when rumours with political motivations can take the centre stage it is important that the government shares the true situation with the people. The recent news report that a national university decided to stop its Covid testing as its positive cases were not being counted, and been rejected, needs to be investigated and clarified by independent authorities. There has been an undercurrent of suspicion that the full spread of the Covid virus was not being disclosed for political reasons. The elevated status recently given by Russia to Sri Lanka as only one of 13 countries that is successful in managing Covid spread and to which Russian airlines could fly to is an exception. Neither has the EU or UK given Sri Lanka such a positive assessment nor has Sri Lanka been acknowledged as a success in managing Covid by international agencies.

The sudden spike in Covid infection can be politically damaging to the government. Its ability to contain the virus formed the basis of its election campaign to demonstrate success in governance. The success of Sri Lanka in keeping its Covid casualty figures extraordinarily low in comparison both to its neighbours and to more developed countries has been greatly appreciated by the electorate who have been witnessing the ongoing tragedies unfold in other parts of the world. The government will need to win back the confidence of the people with regard to its success in Covid management in order to reach its ambitious target of parliamentary seats at the forthcoming general elections.

In recent weeks the government has come under pressure due to a number of factors that could have electoral implications. One is its position on the Millennium Challenge Corporation (MCC) grant of USD 480 million from the United States. This grant became a major campaign issue at the presidential election. The present government leaders bitterly opposed it and claimed that it would be to the detriment of the country’s unity and national sovereignty. However, after the US ambassador stated that a decision on the agreement will be taken after the Parliamentary election in August the issue of the government’s actual position on this grant has surfaced again. The issue over Japanese and Indian investments in Colombo Port, and in relation to the already existing Chinese role, needs also to be resolved.


A wide swathe of supporters of the government have also been disconcerted by the government’s unwillingness to take action against former LTTE commander Karuna who is now a political leader and campaigning for the government. He recently claimed to have killed 2-3,000 soldiers during the war in attempting to boost his credentials with the constituencies in the Eastern province which was formerly a war zone. This has generated a major controversy with many government supporters demanding his arrest and punishment. International human rights organisations, including the UNHRC, have issued calls for an investigation into his claims which fall into the category of war crimes. It must also be remembered that he was deported from the UK citing human rights abuses, including the recruitment of children into combat.

However, even more significant than these ideology and emotion-ridden issues is the continuing deterioration of the living standards of people due to the Covid-induced crisis. Many thousands of businesses are in jeopardy and tens of thousands of workers have been either laid off or are in danger of losing their jobs. This is coupled with the problem of the expatriate Sri Lankan workforce wanting to return to the country due to inhospitable conditions abroad. Many have lost their jobs and are at risk of Covid infection and are pleading to get back to their country, and the slowness of the repatriation process is a matter of humanitarian concern. Hundreds of Sri Lankans living overseas flocked into the country to cast their votes at the Presidential Elections and would be feeling betrayed at their country’s reluctance to take them back when they need its refuge.

In these circumstances there is a call for the postponement of elections on the grounds that the country is facing a dangerous situation in the wake of COVID-19. However, this would lead to a continuation of the status quo in which the caretaker government is making decisions on huge economic investments and loans that are morally and legally beyond the scope of a caretaker government. In addition, difficult decisions are not being made because all parties are thinking about the elections to come. At the present time only President Gotabaya Rajapaksa has the mandate from the people in the context of a dissolved parliament and a caretaker government with caretaker ministers. A government formed out of a parliament with a fresh mandate from the people will have the legitimacy and be adequately representative of the present balance of forces to take the considered and difficult decisions to cope with the manifold problems that beset the country.

Categories: Uncategorized

Communal Politics In Sri Lanka: The Pot Calling The Kettle Black – Part II

Communal Politics In Sri Lanka: The Pot Calling The Kettle Black – Part II

logoI can recollect the early sixties when the Federal Party launched their Satyagraha campaign against the Sinhala Only policy of the Bandaranaikes. The Bandaranaike government having declared a state of emergency under the Public Security Act, Major General Richard Udugama was dispatched to Jaffna to suppress peaceful protests. Tamil leaders were arrested to stop the Federal Party campaign. I can also recollect the late seventies when Tamil militancy was taking root in Jaffna dissatisfied with the peaceful protest campaign of the Tamil leaders. The Jayewardene government, having armed with extensive powers under the Prevention of Terrorism Act, dispatched General Tissa (Bull) Weeratunga to Jaffna to wipe out Tamil militant groups. Despite the career promotions these military men received, peaceful protests of Tamil people grew into a militancy and then into a war. Again, the communalists in the south appear to build up a similar scenario without genuinely working towards addressing the issues of non-majoritarian communities. Instead they continue to aggravate those issues so that they can use them to retain their power and privileges.
Sinhala was taught as a subject in schools in the north and east. The Tamil people did not reject studying Sinhalese until the ‘Sinhala Only Policy’ was adopted in the fifties and used that policy to discriminate against Tamil students in their studies, Tamil public servants in their career promotions, university entrants through standardisation of results, and so on. The religiously and ethnically segregated school system of today was established by the majoritarian led communalistic SLFP and UNP governments, not by any communalistic non-majoritarian community. Thus, the attempts to force Sinhala down the throats of the Tamil people failed and backfired. The outcome was escalating communal riots, and the rise of fundamentalist groupings that ultimately entangled Sri Lanka in separatist and jihadists currents.
Manufactured communalism
Peaceful protests and civil disobedience of Tamil leaders against the Sinhala Only policy and the economic competition between the two communities preceded the riots against Tamils in the south in 1958. Those riots were initiated with the backing of the SLFP led government. Since then, almost every decade there were riots against Tamils in the south resulting in the Sinhalese being attacked in the north. The July 1983 pogrom against Tamils launched by the then UNP regime, and the subsequent war of two and a half decades, ended up causing massive casualties to life, property and economy. The latest was the Easter Sunday bombings of 2019 carried out by Islamic fundamentalists that brought devastation to many, particularly to those of the Christian faith. These incidents are well-known, and we need not go into details.
Most of these incidents were the result of manufactured communalism by the political parties who have been in power for the last seventy odd years. Divisive politics are employed by almost all political parties who had been in power and who want to maintain or acquire power. Uneven development, class divisions, poverty and unemployment have aggravated insecurity among the working people and the rest of the society, making them vulnerable to political manipulation. All major political parties driven by political considerations, and guided by their vested interests, have taken decisions promoting communal violence. The ongoing economic competition between people of diverse ethnicities and faiths, particularly among lower middle and middle class strata, has fuelled communalistic ideologies.
Social media has become a dominant medium of spreading messages for creating communal tension and riots in any part of the country. In addition, some media outlets and political establishments are polarising society along ethnic, linguistic, religious and cultural lines. Many media outlets play a devious role often by sensationalising and disseminating rumours as “news”, thus creating and arousing further tension and clashes between rival communalistic groups. Relative deprivation among all communities is caused by failure to adopt scientific and technological education, and therefore, their insufficient representation in the private and public employment market.
Lack of law and order 
Lack of inter-personal trust and mutual understanding between diverse communities often result in negative perceptions of threat, harassment, fear and danger from one community to the other, which in turn leads to hatred, tensions and ultimately to riots. One of the causes for communalistic violence is the failure of law and security enforcement agencies, as they themselves are influenced by communalistic political ideologies. They have become onlookers and/or instigators of violence abetting the intent of their political masters. Ignoring the rule of law and accountability has been an ongoing cause of communal violence during the last seventy odd years, but not a single regime of green, blue or red political hue has taken any effective measures to rectify this situation. Instead regimes have granted them more immunity to commit such violence with impunity.
Needed reforms
If the author were genuinely concerned with the cancer of communalism then he could start by introducing reforms to the existing criminal justice system to have speedy trials, with arrangements to provide adequate compensation to the victims. There are also several other measures that he could use to deter communalism, such as:
* Revamping educational discourse to focus on values of peace, non-violence, compassion, secularism and humanism, and developing scientific attitudes and rationalism as core values in children at all levels of the education system
* Increasing representation of non-majority communities in all sectors of law enforcement, and providing specialised training for the police to handle communal riots
* Training law enforcement forces on the importance of protecting human rights and enacting basic principles on the use of force and firearms, as provided in the UN code of conduct
* Setting up special investigating and prosecuting agencies that may assist damping major communal discontent, and establishing hotlines to receive complaints and inquiries on racial discrimination
* Using early warning systems for alerting racial tensions and violence that monitor quality of life index (utilising criteria such as housing, health, income and education), and an index to perceive people’s needs and feelings about race relations in specific areas
* Encouraging and supporting civil society projects to create communal awareness, build stronger community relations, and cultivate values of communal harmony
* Establishing community relation units to promote harmony between diverse races and faiths, and conduct community awareness sessions on diverse cultural traditions and anti-discrimination frameworks
* Adopting pro-active approaches for promoting communal harmony, enacting legislation that would help curbing communal violence and then genuinely implementing them.

Read More

Categories: Uncategorized

Explosion in Iyakachchi and aborted Black Tiger day plot

Explosion in Iyakachchi and aborted Black Tiger day plot

  • Intelligence officials say that the bombs were to be transported to Mullaitivu to stage an attack to mark the Black Tiger day on July 5
  • Australian Tamil Congress was previously listed as a banned LTTE entity by the Sri Lankan government under UN Security Council resolution 1373
  • Sri Lanka can look into measures adopted by countries such as Singapore against polarizing ethnic discourse
14 July 2020
On July 3, a minor explosion ripped through a white-walled house in Iyakachchi, about 25km from Kilinochchi. It was the residence of Thangarajah Thevathasan, also known as Menon, an ex-member of the LTTE’s intelligence wing, and his school teacher wife. Menon, who was also a bomb expert in his days with the Tigers, had been testing an improvised explosive device in a sardine tin when it accidentally went off. Seriously injured, he was rushed to Kilinochchi hospital and was later transferred to the Anuradhapura hospital. He succumbed to injuries on July 8. The bomb disposal units later recovered three locally made bombs and a banner commemorating the Black Tigers. His wife and two others were arrested by the TID and currently held under the detention orders.
Intelligence officials say that the bombs were to be transported to Mullaitivu to stage an attack to mark the Black Tiger day on July 5. The accidental explosion foiled the plot. The ex-Tiger was acting on the behest of an LTTE member domiciled in France.

On July 5, an emerging Tamil fringe, led by MK Sivajilingam, Gajendrakumar Ponnambalam and Sivagnanam Shritharan commemorated the Black Tiger day in Nelliady Madhya Maha Vidyalayam. The very location, where the first Black Tiger, Vallipuram Vasanthan, known in his nom de guerre, Captain Miller drove an explosive-laden truck 33 years ago, killing 40 soldiers. Another night vigil was held at Jaffna University. In Sydney, Australian MP Huge McDermott attended a Black Tiger commemoration event organized by the Australian Tamil Congress. The event was presided over by ex-LTTE cadres, Salkillai and ex-Sea Tigers’ training teacher, Vetharasa Dinesh, both lit up the memorial flame. Garlanded photos of 346 slain suicide cadres were in display.
The Australian Tamil Congress was previously listed as a banned LTTE entity by the Sri Lankan government under UN Security Council resolution 1373. It was later de-listed in 2015. Elsewhere in Europe, ceremonies were held in Bobigny in France, Bern in Switzerland, Essen in Germany and Denmark.
The Black Tigers, the suicide wing of the LTTE, were the ultimate force multipliers of the LTTE’s deadly arsenal. Black sea tigers sank one-third of Navy fleet during the war. Suicide cadres targeted both military and non-military targets, bombing the economic nerve centres, and election rallies, killing a former Indian PM, a Sri Lankan President, wiped out the entire frontline leadership of the UNP. Embryonic Air Black Tigers flew night-time raids in Colombo. In July 2008, the LTTE declared that 356 Black Tigers had been killed in suicide missions, 254 of them in sea operations. Scores perished in the final year, trying to push back the Sri Lankan government military offensive.
Black Tigers are suicide terrorists. It would have caused outrage had the Islamists commemorated the 19 hijackers of 9/11 attacks and politicians placating to ethnic vote graced the event. The members of the current government and their fellow travellers cried blue murder when the Tamils were allowed to remember their war dead in Mullivaikkal. However, mourning the dead loved ones is different from celebrating suicide terrorism. Especially when the LTTE cultivated a cult hysteria of martyrdom through elaborate rituals venerating the fallen cadre, which effectively was the prime driver for the membership of its suicide wing.
The government should draw a line between that poisonous ideology and the legitimate right to remembrance. That cannot be achieved by naïve liberal democratic defence of dissent (even if it is about celebrating dead suicide terrorists) or full- blooded Sinhala nationalist hysteria. It is a delicate choice. However, Sri Lanka can look into measures adopted by countries such as Singapore against polarizing ethnic discourse – thought the same yardstick may not serve in the other aspects of democratic dissent and civic participation.
The government is also considering to re-list a number of diaspora groups as banned LTTE front groups under the UN Security Council Resolution 1373. In March 2014, the then government of Mahinda Rajapaksa listed the LTTE and 15 organisation and  400 individuals as ‘banned LTTE foreign terrorist front organizations’ and ‘LTTE terrorists’. The List included Tamil Rehabilitation Organization, Tamil Coordination Committee, British Tamil Forum, World Tamil Movement, Canadian Tamil Congress, Australian Tamil Congress, Global Tamil Forum, National Council of Australian Tamils, Tamil National Council, Tamil Youth Organization, World Tamil Coordinating Committee, Transnational Government of Tamil Eelam, Tamil Eelam People’s Assembly, World Tamil Relief Fund, Headquarters Group, and individuals such as Perinbanayagam Sivaparan alias Nediyavan, Fr. S.J. Emmanuel, V. Rudrakumar and Sekarampillai Vinayakamoorthy alias Vinayagam.
In November, following year, the newly elected Yahapalana government de-listed eight groups: Global Tamil Forum, British Tamil Forum, National Council of Canadian Tamils,Tamil Youth Organization, World Tamil Coordinating Committee, Canadian Tamil Congress, Australian Tamil Congress and Tamil National Council.
The government is reportedly considering the relisting of these groups. The idea of de-listing these groups by the Yahapalanaya was that it would facilitate the reconciliation process. Some of the members sought to cooperate with the government. Yet, the essential anti-Sri Lankan narrative of these groups remained intact. The new administration seems to believe a better way to deal with these groups is taking the high road. However, it would still help if it does not push diaspora members who desire genuine reconciliation to the shadows.
The premature explosion in Iyakachchi, however, is a concern. It echoes another overlooked early warning sign: The discovery of bomb-making materials in Wanathawillu leading up to the Easter Sunday attack in January 2019. This government is better equipped in personalities and outlook to safeguard national security. However, the Black Tiger day bomb plot was laid bare only by an accident, and not by an active intelligence operation. That may also reveal a lacuna in security measures. This does not mean to call for ultra-intrusive intelligence and military activities, which could backfire.
However, each collective tragedy of the independent history was in the making for long enough time. The aborted blast in Iyakachchi should not be a precursor of another one in the making.
Follow @RangaJayasuriya on twitter
Categories: Uncategorized

Democracy can help manage the pandemic and its economic fallout

Democracy can help manage the pandemic and its economic fallout

A shock such as the sudden lockdown of the entire country, enforced by a curfew, is likely to have exhausted the reserves of many daily wage earners and pushed them below the poverty line – Pic by Shehan Gunasekara 

Tuesday, 14 July 2020

Multiple pandemics

The coronavirus-borne disease is not the only pandemic afflicting the world. It is accompanied by an infodemic of disinformation that is making a scientific response challenging. Anti-vaxxers may cause serious harm when a successful vaccine has been developed and is being administered to people across the world. Beyond all this is a pandemic of political leaders seeking autocratic powers. The World Health Organization is helping coordinate the response to the first two. We are on our own with the autocracy pandemic.

Hungary and the Philippines are examples of autocracy achieved through formal means. In Hungary, Viktor Orban, the Prime Minister since 2010, got the legislature to cede all its powers to him in the name of the coronavirus. He will decide when to give them back. Duterte of the Philippines got the legislature to give him three months of emergency authority and keeps asking for extensions. There are informal methods too. In India, the legislature was prorogued on 23 March on account of the pandemic and has not met since. Still within the law, but people are beginning to worry.

One may think that this is a reasonable course of action. Parliaments can be seen as distractions. Why listen to speeches from the opposition when there is work to be done? Parliament is all talk. What we need now is action.

But this is an overly simplistic and counter-productive perspective. The quality of decisions taken by autocrats who have dispensed with parliamentary oversight is poor. Announcing decisions and walking them back in days and weeks is not optimal. Failing to consider collateral effects of policy changes and having to scramble with patchwork solutions to remedy unintended negative outcomes is not the definition of efficiency.

Managing the economic fallout 

The virus and the actions being taken to manage it are having massive effects on the world economy. According to the latest IMF World Economic Outlook: “Global growth is projected at -4.9% in 2020, 1.9 percentage points below the April 2020 World Economic Outlook (WEO) forecast. … In 2021 global growth is projected at 5.4%. Overall, this would leave 2021 GDP some 6½ percentage points lower than in the pre-COVID-19 projections of January 2020.”

The Great Recession of 2007-09 is not comparable. What is comparable is the Great Depression of 1929 that stretched through the 1930s. I grew up thinking it was a distant event that led to the rise of fascism and the rescue of democracy in the US by Franklin Roosevelt. But the repercussions had been felt strongly in the less globalised and much smaller Ceylon (population of just over 5 million) of the day. Research by M.R.P. Salgado showed that even back then, we were vulnerable to demand collapse in export markets. The per capita GDP which was $ 80 in 1926 came down to $ 33 by 1932.

The impacts are expected to be severe in Sri Lanka’s present-day principal export markets, the US, UK and Europe. With unemployment likely to reach depression levels in those countries and Keynesian support payments tapering off, the prospects are not good for the recovery of demand for high-end apparel and tourism in these markets. These industries will have to pivot to new markets. Income and employment from labour exports will be radically destabilised.

According to Verite Research, 45% of households were affected by loss of daily wages because of the curfew. Severe effects were felt by 37% of households. How the combined effects of the curfew, the return of expatriate workers, the reduced remittances and pay cuts will play out remains to be seen. A shock such as the sudden lockdown of the entire country, enforced by a curfew, is likely to have exhausted the reserves of many daily wage earners and pushed them below the poverty line.

The collapse of demand in the apparel and tourist industries will cause even those with more stable income streams to be frugal, resulting in depressed demand for goods and services of all sorts which will continue to impact all sectors in the economy and push more of the near poor into poverty. Lots of people will lose jobs. The return of thousands of expatriate workers will reduce the spending ability of many households that relied on remittances and will drive down the price of labour.

In all, we will be looking at 1929-1940 type economic conditions, described by Nobel Laureate Robert Shiller as an economic downturn that was followed by a prolonged malaise. How best to manage the malaise?

Decision makers must have available to them multiple streams of information. Democracy, in addition to its many familiar attributes, is an information mechanism serving decision makers, be they political authorities or officials. As we pick through the causes of the delay in the reporting of the emergence of the pandemic in China’s Wuhan city, it is becoming clear that the lack of democracy in China was a contributory factor. The incentives governing the actions of the regional authorities resulted in a delay of days in reporting. The central authorities did not have good-quality information to act upon.

This is a narrative that helped explain the collapse of the central planning model implemented in the former Soviet Union. What happens at ground level is known to officials lowest in the hierarchy. They are subject to various incentives in terms of what they report to their superiors and what they do not. Do they get rewarded for high numbers or low numbers? How long will it take for falsifications to be discovered? Because of garbage data coming up, the Soviet state ended up a victim of garbage decisions.

Creating space for multiple streams of information is easier than creating the right incentives for officials. But this gives rise to the problem of assessing the quality of the information, of separating the wheat from the chaff. An internal culture of discussion, debate and information seeking is essential. Many see this as unproductive and time-wasting. But in conditions of imperfect information such as those we now live in, there is no alternative. Not just an active Parliament exercising its oversight functions diligently, but public hearings and consultations are needed. Active efforts to get out of bubbles and echo chambers are important.

Democracy, especially of the kind that we have in our country, is not perfect. Information flows within the state are distorted and incomplete. But the alternative based on task forces dominated by military mindsets is worse. These are the choices before us as we face the multiple pandemics.

Categories: Uncategorized



Sri Lanka Brief13/07/2020
Six journalists’ organisations in Sri Lanka have come together to launch a Chater on  Rights and Responsibilities of Journalists in the face of increasing threats to jobs and their rights in the country.
 It says that “Within the last 12 months, hundreds of journalists have lost their jobs, hence increasing the job insecurity of the industry, further discouraging the engagement of the new generation into the field. and call for better working conditions and ethical journalism.
Sri Lanka Working Journalists Association (SLWJA) has taken the initiative to prepare the charter and it will be launched on 17 July 2020 in Colombo.
The full text of the RPC follows:
Reaffirming the fundamental importance of rights and responsibilities of journalists as a cornerstone of democracy and the heart of public interest and freedom of expression;
Emphasizing local and international labour rights;
Reaffirming that organizing and unionization will be the future of journalists’ rights;
Convinced that respect for rights and responsibilities of journalists will lead to the greater public interest at any given time;
Recalling that adhering professional codes of ethics in media is a fundamental must towards professional journalism;
Desiring to promote the liability of media ownership in par with the rights of journalists;
agree to promote as often and as best to establish a culture of ethical and responsible journalism.
Violation of journalists’ rights and shutting down media outlets without observing proper labour procedures have become common malpractice in Sri Lanka. Within the last 12 months, hundreds of journalists have lost their jobs, hence increasing the job insecurity of the industry, further discouraging the engagement of the new generation into the field.
It has been found that there is a serious lack of knowledge on the rights and responsibilities of journalists even among the advocacy organizations and unions who work for the betterment of the industry. Among other things, the media ownership and the state/government should recognize journalists’ rights towards freedom of expression, ethical journalism, and the right to be a part of unions or associations. While adhering professional codes of conduct, journalists should observe their obligations towards their professional responsibilities for the public interest, which deems as the foremost rule of journalism.
After carefully studying various local and international instruments on Rights and Responsibilities of journalists, this Charter (hereinafter RRC) is an attempt to recognize and summarize specific guidelines and claims, emphasizing the Sri Lankan context hence upholding the stringent validity and importance of Rights and Responsibilities of journalists in Sri Lanka.
Signatories to the RRC
  • Sri Lanka Working Journalists Association (SLWJA)
  • Free Media Movement (FMM)
  • Sri Lanka Muslim Media Forum (SLMMF)
  • Sri Lanka Tamil Media Forum (SLTMF)
  • Media Employees Trade Unions (METU)
  • Young Journalists Association (YJA)
1. Journalists claim all rights that are in par with all relevant labor laws, other laws, by-laws and regulations operating within designated jurisdictions, despite texts of their service contracts, Job Descriptions (JD’s), and/ or working conditions.
2. Journalists have their rights to lobby, organizing, networking, and perform their professional duty with dignity within an organization or individual.
3. Journalists have a ‘right to know’ the media institution where they serve and its ownership (including but not limited to their business background etc.) hence, they should not restrict from facts checking and access to information other than such a restriction has been provided by any written law in the country.
4. Journalists must be informed of all important decisions and policies which could, by nature, affect the life of the company and its existence with true facts.
5. Journalists cannot be forced to perform a professional act or to express an opinion that is contrary to their professional codes of ethics and/or public interest such as myth and ignorance. On such occasions, journalists have a free will and ability to question and challenge decisions and policies of media owners or employers or policy and decision-makers.
6. Journalists claim free access to all sources of information, hence having appropriate facilities and safeguards to access to information including but not limited to free access to the internet, device security, encryption of target based information should be guaranteed by the employer and media owner.
7. Journalists claim the right of journalists to carry out their work under safe conditions including but not limited to online harassments in conflict and non-conflict situations.
8. Journalists have a right to develop their career in-par with modern technologies including but not limited to digital literacy, towards their skills developments (Eg: participating to trainings, workshops (local or foreign), scholarships, etc.).
9. Journalists claim their democratic right to freely inquire on all facts that are part of the public sphere, engaging with social-political activities and professional dissemination of such information for public interest at any time.
10. Journalists claim the right of well-informed decisions related to recruitments, terminations, transfers, promotions, redundancy, changes of media ownership, and management.
1. Journalists have a responsibility to organize and network and unionize in order to protect their workers’ rights for the betterment of the media industry.
2. Journalists have a responsibility to promote organizing, unionizing, and networking co-workers within the organization with other unions in various industries.
3. Journalists have a responsibility to keep informed their media unions on non-obligation to ethics codes as well as their or their co-worker’s rights infringements, violations and developments of the said scenarios.
4. Journalists have a responsibility to create and promote watchdog mechanisms within the media house and unions in order to observe professional ethics.
5. Journalists are obliged to inform the immediate supervisor (i.e. editor/news manager) of Conflict of Interest related to their performance at any given time.
6. Journalists have a responsibility to use social media, safeguarding their professionalism, nevertheless the said social media conduct does not necessarily reflect their professional conduct as a journalist to a particular media organization.
7. When it comes to an ethical dilemma, consulting recognized structures (such as PCCSL) who overlook ethics violations is a journalist’s responsibility.
8. Journalists have a responsibility to keep professional secrecy and not revealing the information to obtain confidentially.
9. Journalists have responsibility for self-proclaimed self-criticism, identifying entry points for further ethical development, and complying with the correcting process.
10. Journalists have a responsibility for not engaging in journalism that contradicts the public interest, such as ignorance and myth.
Implementation Framework:
SLWJA, with the support of other partner organizations and unions, will introduce and promote the RRC among journalists, editors, media owners, associations, unions, government representatives and academia in order to create awareness and wider commitment in media fraternity towards rights and responsibilities of journalists.
Categories: Uncategorized

King Maker Of 2020

King Maker Of 2020

logoAs usual, several new political parties have made their appearance in the 2020 Parliamentary elections. There are many independent candidates too; in Colombo district alone there are 16 political parties and 26 independent groups. Politics seem to have reached every nook and cranny of the people lives. As a result, despite the covid-19 health threat, a large turnout at the polling stations can be expected and on the night of 6th August, the obvious question will be who has won the Sri Lankan parliamentary elections. The outcome will not be very pleasing to all three major political factions; “Pohottuwa”, “UNP” and “SJB” lead by three traditional politicians.
Unfortunately in this election also, these three political factions have adopted the usual political mantra based on unrealistic and false promises hoping to bamboozle the rabble. The trio of Machiavellians has gone into frenzy of making promises, knowing fully well that none will be fulfilled.  What a shameful act; at least they should be decent enough to make these outrages promises less gleefully.    
Mantras of “Pohottuwa”
SLPP leader Mahinda Rajapaksa has been chanting “Two-thirds Majority” mantra at every political rally. How can the voters forget the goal of the 18th Amendment to the constitution and the alleged excesses of his regime from 2005 to 2014? He did all that with two-thirds majority.  It is self-evident, that Mahinda and his “pohottuwa” have failed to fulfill the promises made on MCC, ECT and Mattala Airport during the presidential election campaign in 2019. They should understand that majority of the voters are not gullible to be swayed by political rhetoric about not-selling the national assets. So far his party has been vague on national issues just like the other two. Furthermore, people are exhausted about their fear mongering tactics about communalistic politics. The recent comment; “cat’s paw of communalistic political parties” is somewhat counterproductive especially when people are fully aware of the policies pursued by a few questionable characters such as Badiuddin Mahmud, Rishard Bathiudeen, Rauf Hakeem, Hizbullah and Azath Salley. “SLPP (SLFP)” needs to get into a navel gazing exercise before making any comments about communalist politics.
What an irony “pohottuwa” party has failed to capitalize on the massive goodwill earned by President Gotabaya Rajapaksa in November 2019. They will pay dearly on the day of election for the blunders made in managing cost of basic foods, for not passing the benefits of highly reduced oil prices to the consumers, electricity and water bill debacle, scarcity of fertilizer and the attacks directed on former president Maithree.  
Mantras of other two parties
There is a slight difference between political “Mantras” of UNP/SJB and the SLPP. The UNP/SJB’s promises such as Rs.20, 000 a month living allowance and financial loans at the interest rate of 4% are not only realistic and false they are hilarious. Moreover, the timing of election is the enemy of both UNP and the breakaway party SJB. These two parties have to deal with two simultaneous crucial tasks; building individual identity (image) and facing the parliamentary elections. It was a very costly and ugly divorce, both parties have hardly had any time to recover from the aftermath of the divorce, especially when SJB is in the denial state.
Ranil (UNP) and Sajith (SJB) are trying to beat each other with false promises. What a mockery; these two seem to be following the literal meaning of what Margaret Thatcher, a darling of conservatism once said “Everything a politician promises at election time has to be paid either by higher taxation or by borrowing” 
One has to look at the promises made during the election campaign of 2015 briefly. The voters vividly  remember Ranil’s election rhetoric about vouching to regain majority in the parliament and making it as the United National Party’s Government, at the same time he also promised to secure the future of younger generations and promised that his government will launch 1 million jobs for the youth as well as a highly advanced telecommunication network paving the way for digital economy. He failed to fulfill all promises and governance system was made worst to appease leaders of communalistic politics in Sri Lanka. The economy was ruined, nation’s image was sullied and our security was abandoned.
The record of Sajith is no better. As the deputy leader of the oldest political party, he seems to have worked day and night to defeat his own party leader. Dayasiri and Johnston, former UNP members may be able to enlighten and expand on the contentious behavior better.  Sajith has nothing to show the voters as his main achievements therefore he always tends to talk about his late father Ransinghe Premadsa’s accomplishments. Surely “deeds not words” is true. He was first elected from the Hambantota District in 2000.  After nearly 20 years in the parliament, apparently, he has failed to establish his credibility among the voters of Hambantota first; Sajith was able to obtain only 25.5% of the total votes (425,000) as Presidential candidate of 2019. May be Ruwan Wijewardene knew more than what we are led to believe, when he uttered the words; “Sajith Premadasa should not have rushed in. He should have waited patiently until the 2025 Presidential elections when he could have led the UNP and become the President”. Wishful thinking, yet Ruwan Wijewardene has failed to realize that neither Ranil nor Sajith have accomplished anything significant enough for the voters to be convinced.
Another subject troubling the voters are neither UNP nor SJB have stated their position clearly on MCC, ECT or Mattala Airport. Both parties are very critical on the stance taken by “pohottuwa”, yet hiding their own positions. The previous government dominated by the members of these two parties was very enthusiastic in concluding these agreements without any public discussions. Ranil, Mangala, Malik, Kabir Hashim were in the forefront of negotiating these international contracts with the relevant countries. Suddenly all have become silent guardians of the nation by blaming the SLPP for the ambiguity in these contracts. UNP/SJB must take the full responsibility for the alleged duplicity content or the contract clauses detrimental to our sovereignty in the above unsigned contracts.
Arrogance leads to failure
The chances of overwhelming success of all three major political parties at the next election have been dampened by the arrogance and hubris of the key individuals in the party establishments. Former MPs and the leaders through their rhetoric have displayed inflated sense of entitlement and superiority. Some have attacked religious leaders and others have attacked former presidents (dead and living) with unsavory words. Arrogant politicians possessing exaggerated sense of superiority do not have any feedback seeking behaviors also they discount diagnostic information in their work environments. It explains why our present and political leaders have lead failed governments. It explains why Mangala lead by Ranil co-sponsored UNHCR 30/1- Promoting reconciliation, accountability and human rights in Sri LankaIt explains why Mahinda appointed his friend Cabraal to be the CB Governor and why Ranil appointed his friend Arjuna as CB Governor .It explains why a Former Prime Minister alleged to have had breakfast with a drug kingpin. It explains why a Former President eliminated first-past-the-post electoral system and made the presidency an executive post with dictatorial powers. It explains why 18th and 19th amendments were adopted with the approval of all traditional political parties. It explains why semiliterate ruffians have assumed very important ministerial portfolios. Finally, it explains why Sri Lankan politicians think their children deserve better than other children.      
Effect of Social Media
Just like traditional politicians, main stream media run by the state or by the private organizations sponsored by various political establishments has lost credibility among the young and educated voters accounting for over 30% of the total. Social media has become the most preferred tool among this young and vibrant group to learn about people, economy, finance, international affairs and politics. Furthermore, frustration among the traditional politicians due to their inability get the cavalier and deceitful promises effectively to the unsuspecting voters has been exacerbated by the threat of Covid-19 and related newly announced election campaign laws. 
Given the above summary of three major traditional political factions, their arrogance, and the active role played by the social media it is inconceivable that anyone of them will be able to muster enough support to form a majority government. It will be a hung parliament and to the delight of voters, most likely all three leaders will be vying to be the Prime Minister through wheeling and dealing. As a result, there will be a “King Maker” to decide who will be the next prime minister.
The King Maker

Read More

Categories: Uncategorized

This political system has made people slaves:Deepani Silva

This political system has made people slaves:Deepani Silva

  • Arts have been suppressed by politics
  • JVP lost its morale after it formed an alliance
  • The NPP is a progressive political force
14 July 2020
Veteran actress Deepani Silva who is on the National People’s Power (NPP) national list says people should consider electing newcomers to Parliament and ask what the country’s elected representatives have done for the people so far. One of her main objectives is to see more women participating in politics and to provide meaningful relief to the people.
Excerpts :
Q Why did you decide to do  politics from NPP national list?

I don’t have an intention to enter Parliament, but want to add strength to the national list. In fact I have had an interest in politics from a young age.
QWhat are the main issues you are addressing?
Women’s representation in politics is one of the priorities. Besides, the country is in dire straits. The country doesn’t have one law. The cost of living is escalating and people have no relief. So my vision is to convince them to vote for a party that will work for them. Even as an artiste I have many concerns. One of them is that artistes don’t have the freedom to do a production of their choice. Artistes don’t have a way to serve the people. They don’t have enough facilities to do a local production. There’s no equal distribution where the needs of the people are concerned. There are several mini theatre complexes in large shopping malls in Colombo. But if you go to an area like Hambantota those people have no opportunity to watch a film at a movie hall. Their only mode of entertainment is watching TV. But on TV, the channels are manipulating viewers. Therefore people are forced to watch TV. If we take the education system it again creates a divide. Children in Kalutara district don’t have the same privileges as school children in Colombo. But they all sit for the same exam. From a political perspective people have started hating politicians. If that happens we will go in for a dictatorship, but we don’t need that. But it’s the people’s responsibility to choose the right people to enter Parliament.
  • One of them is that artistes don’t have the freedom to do a production of their choice
  • If that happens we will go in for a dictatorship, but we don’t need that
  • They say we have to save the country from other Sinhala Tamils, Muslims, Catholics and Burghers. But none of them wants to save the country from American and Chinese influences
  • The politics that I’m engaging in doesn’t follow such principles. This is why people need to elect newcomers to Parliament
Q Do you think addressing these issues from a leftist party such as NPP carries more weight?
Definitely. I have full confidence in the NPP because it comprises people who have led struggles to change this system. They didn’t enter politics for the benefits. It includes qualified individuals striving for change. The NPP has also launched 10 policies covering several areas that require immediate attention.
QPeople have always voted for the main two parties. Is it possible to change the voter’s mindset to vote for an alternative party?
It is a challenging task and will not happen at once. We have a lot of pressure coming from all sides. But our society is largely divided into the haves and have nots. The haves will always help the have nots in a step-by-step manner, so that they can capitalise on their benefits. Although it’s a challenge we will not give up. People should consider electing newcomers to Parliament because nepotism is rampant. Sri Lankan politics has always been a family affair. But even in a death donation society members of the same family cannot be office bearers. So how can one family have it their way? The existing political system has made people slaves. If we take religion, they have been influenced by Sinhala-Buddhist ideologies. They say we have to save the country from other Sinhala Tamils, Muslims, Catholics and Burghers. But none of them wants to save the country from American and Chinese influences.
QBut don’t you think that the power of leftist parties in Sri Lanka and around the world have weakened over the years?
True. I initially joined the Communist Party. But those parties are no more. In fact I initially supported the JVP before I pledged support to the NPP. Probably the JVP lost its morale after it formed an alliance. A leftist party is governed by its principles and discipline. Once it forms an alliance it weakens. But I must say that the NPP is a progressive political force.
QThere are several artistes who are engaged in politics. Is it an added benefit to them?
Engaging in politics for career artistes doesn’t really benefit them. Arts has been suppressed by politics. If you are an independent group there are lesser chances of obtaining political support. Therefore, many artistes are cornered within the political system. Although there’s no benefit I have come to serve the people.
QBut it’s a known fact that many people enter politics for all the perks and benefits ..
The politics that I’m engaging in doesn’t follow such principles. This is why people need to elect newcomers to Parliament. What they have seen is the same crowd getting elected and robbing people’s money. But what have they done for this country? I started my career as a teledrama actress and have my own vehicle. In fact, we are paid when we attend meetings and we are fully looked after with meals etc., but I am not someone who’s going after those benefits.
QAs you know there’s a greater competition when coming from the National List. What if you lose this time?
I will continue with my work in politics while also engaging in arts.
Categories: Uncategorized

Blog at