Sen. Richard Burr is stepping down as chairman of the Intelligence Committee, following the seizure of his cellphone by FBI agents investigating stock trades made before the coronavirus crashed financial markets, and officials revealed Thursday that Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) also has been questioned by authorities over her husband’s investment decisions during that time frame.

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) said in a statement that Burr informed him Thursday morning “of his decision to step aside as Chairman of the Intelligence Committee during the pendency of the investigation. We agreed that this decision would be in the best interests of the committee and will be effective at the end of the day tomorrow.”

The decision to step aside acknowledges the awkward, ethically fraught dynamic that would have existed if Burr (R-N.C.) had continued to lead a committee with oversight responsibilities for an agency conducting a criminal investigation of his conduct.

 

It also has implications for the delicate balance of power between the government’s executive and legislative branches, suggesting that an investigation alone may be enough to remove a senior lawmaker from a key post. In the case of Sen. Robert Menendez (D-N.J.), he did not step down from a ranking committee position until he after he was indicted on corruption charges in 2015 — a case that eventually fell apart.

A senior Justice Department official said the warrant for Burr’s cellphone was approved “at the highest levels” of the agency and was served on Burr’s lawyer — though the phone had to be retrieved from Burr’s home.

Investigators obtained a search warrant to examine data in the senator’s cloud storage for his iPhone, according to a person familiar with the case. The Burr search warrants were first reported by the Los Angeles Times on Wednesday.

 

Tom Mentzer, a spokesman for Feinstein, said Thursday that she was “asked some basic questions by law enforcement about her husband’s stock transactions.” The spokesman said Feinstein “was happy to voluntarily answer those questions to set the record straight and provided additional documents to show she had no involvement in her husband’s transactions. There have been no follow up actions on this issue.” She was questioned in April, aides said.

Disclosure records show Feinstein and her husband sold between $1.5 million to $6 million worth of stock between Jan. 31 and Feb. 18.

Speaking briefly to reporters Thursday, Burr said he has been cooperating with investigators “from the beginning,” and urged everyone “to let this investigation play out.”

 

He said he stepped aside as chairman because the insider trading investigation “is a distraction to the hard work of the committee, and the members and I think that the security of the country is too important to have a distraction.”

Because the intelligence committee is a select committee, its Republican membership and leadership is largely up to McConnell. Aides to the majority leader declined to comment Thursday afternoon when asked whom he might install as chairman. Burr is expected to remain on the committee even though he will not be chairman.

If McConnell chooses to go by seniority, Sen. James E. Risch (R-Idaho), would be next in line to chair the committee, but he already leads the Senate Foreign Relations Committee. After Risch is Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.), a national security hawk who had been widely expected to take over the committee once Burr retires. But Rubio currently leads the Senate Small Business Committee, a once-sleepy panel that is suddenly relevant now with a small-business lending program the centerpiece of a $2 trillion coronavirus rescue package passed by Congress last month.

 

Both Risch and Rubio declined to comment at the Capitol, as did their offices.

 

Another Republican, Sen. Lindsey O. Graham (R-S.C.), defended Burr and said he believed the lawmaker’s explanation that his trades were based on media reports he saw at that time on the business news channel CNBC.

“I don’t believe he did anything criminally wrong, maybe used poor judgment, I guess, but I know Richard and he’s the one guy I can tell you who actually does watch CNBC Hong Kong,” said Graham. “The bottom line is, let’s just see how this turns out. I’ve got nothing but good things to say about Richard Burr.”

An FBI spokeswoman declined to comment, “in keeping with our standard practice of neither confirming nor denying the existence of our investigations.”

 

The Justice Department has been investigating stock trades Burr made since March. The inquiry followed a review of public disclosures, first reported by the Center for Responsive 

Politics and ProPublica, that showed Burr and his wife sold 33 stocks worth between $628,033 and $1.72 million — including many in sectors hard-hit by the pandemic, such as the hotel, restaurant and shipping industries. Burr reportedly received daily coronavirus briefings in the weeks leading up to the February sell-off. His brother-in-law also sold off significant shares in February, ProPublica reported last week.

 

In early February, Burr co-wrote a Fox News op-ed in which he reassured Americans “the United States today is better prepared than ever before to face emerging public health threats, like the coronavirus.” On Feb. 13, he sold his stocks.

From late February through mid-March, the stock market posted steep declines as the coronavirus reached the United States and states began implementing stay-at-home orders that hampered or shut down large segments of the American economy.

 

Burr has denied wrongdoing and asked for the Senate Ethics Committee to review his financial dealings.

Members of Congress were barred in 2012 from using information not available to the wider public. Burr was one of just three senators who voted against the Stop Trading on Congressional Knowledge (Stock) Act, which extended insider-trading regulations to U.S. senators and representatives. At the time, he called the legislation “ludicrous.”

 

No one has been charged under the Stock Act, and legal experts say it would be difficult to do so given court rulings in a prior investigation involving health-care stocks. But the execution of a search warrant against a member of Congress is a significant step, one requiring the approval of senior law enforcement officials.

 

“This is not something the FBI or DOJ does lightly,” Preet Bharara, a former U.S. attorney for the Southern District of New York, tweeted Wednesday night. “It requires layers of review, the blessing of a judge, and consideration of severe reputational harm to a sitting US Senator.”

A search warrant indicates investigators were able to show to the satisfaction of a federal judge or magistrate probable cause to suspect a crime occurred and an expectation of the search yielding evidence.

 

“Investigation of Sen. Richard Burr just got serious,” tweeted Barb McQuade, a law professor at the University of Michigan and a former U.S. attorney for Michigan.

A search warrant is usually used in the later stages of an investigation because it requires sufficient evidence to show a judge probable cause and because it requires notice to the subject, meaning covert investigative steps are no longer possible. https://www.axios.com/fbi-warrant-richard-burr-in-stocks-sell-off-probe-ecd7dbb2-a807-433f-b9b6-183845118dd9.html 

Chairman Richard Burr, R-N.C., reaches for hand sanitizer at a Senate Intelligence Committee nomination hearing for Rep. John Ratcliffe, R-Texas, on Capitol Hill in Washington, Tuesday, May. 5

 

LA Times: FBI serves warrant on Richard Burr in stocks sell-off probe

Burr denies any wrongdoing.

axios.com

766 people are talking about this

Burr was not the only senator accused of abusing coronavirus-related information that wasn’t available to the general public to make personal financial decisions. Sen. Kelly Loeffler (R-Ga.) also came under fire after the Daily Beast reported she had sold a significant share of stocks in January after attending the same briefings as Burr. Loeffler has denied playing an active role in the sales and called the outcry over the transactions a “political attack.”

Sen. James M. Inhofe (R-Okla.) also drew public scrutiny for selling stocks around the same time.

Some legal observers noted there would be a potential disparity if Burr was investigated but not other members of Congress who engaged in similar trades, particularly Loeffler. After the Justice Department’s investigation of Burr became public, a Loeffler spokesman said federal law enforcement officials had not contacted her.

 

Burr and President Trump have had a tense relationship at times.

Last year, the Senate Intelligence Committee that Burr chairs issued a subpoena against Donald Trump Jr. as part of an investigation of potential ties between the Trump campaign and Russian operatives. The subpoena was inconvenient for the Republicans defending the president, who were trying to dismiss the investigation as a politically motivated hit job. Burr also developed a cooperative and collegial relationship with a lawmaker across the aisle, Sen. Mark R. Warner (Va.), the committee’s ranking Democrat. Their rapport was frowned upon by Trump loyalists.

As recently as Monday, Trump has retweeted criticism of Burr about the Russia investigation.

Matt Zapotosky and Paul Kane contributed to this report.